Trump’s Threat to BRICS – Will It Hold Water?

President-elect Donald Trump’s recent declaration to impose 100% tariffs on BRICS nations if they pursue the creation of a new currency has stirred global attention.

The warning, issued as the BRICS bloc explores alternatives to the U.S. dollar, highlights the growing friction between the United States and emerging economies seeking to reduce their dependency on the dollar-dominated global financial system. But does this threat carry enough weight to deter the BRICS countries, or is it more rhetoric than reality?

---

Understanding the Context

The BRICS nations—Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa—have been discussing the possibility of a shared currency to facilitate trade among members. This initiative, which gained momentum after Russia faced Western sanctions, aims to provide an alternative to the U.S. dollar, which has long been the backbone of international trade and finance.

Adding to this dynamic, the bloc recently expanded to include nations like Saudi Arabia and the UAE, further bolstering its economic influence. Together, the BRICS nations account for over 40% of the world’s population and nearly a quarter of global GDP. Their combined economic weight and diversification of resources, from energy to technology, make them a formidable force.

Trump’s reaction underscores U.S. concerns about maintaining the dollar’s dominance. A successful BRICS currency could shift the balance of economic power, undermining U.S. influence globally.

---

The Credibility of Trump’s Threat

Trump’s proposed 100% tariffs on BRICS nations represent a dramatic escalation in trade policy. The question, however, is whether such a move is feasible or effective. Here’s a closer look:

Economic Interdependence

• Many BRICS nations, particularly China and India, are critical trading partners for the U.S. China alone is America’s largest goods trading partner, with bilateral trade exceeding $700 billion annually. Imposing punitive tariffs on these economies could trigger retaliatory measures, potentially destabilizing global trade.
• Tariffs of this magnitude could lead to higher costs for American consumers and businesses, particularly for goods sourced from BRICS nations.

Global Supply Chain Disruption

• The BRICS bloc contributes significantly to global supply chains, particularly in manufacturing, energy, and raw materials. Disrupting these trade flows could create shortages, inflationary pressures, and economic turmoil—challenges the U.S. economy can ill afford amid its ongoing recovery from inflation and post-pandemic restructuring.

Geopolitical Pushback

• Imposing sweeping tariffs risks alienating U.S. allies in the BRICS bloc, such as India, which has maintained a delicate balance between its relationships with the U.S. and Russia. Such actions could also deepen the divide between the Global North and South, driving more nations toward BRICS’ orbit.

Domestic and Global Resistance

• Within the U.S., such a tariff policy would likely face resistance from businesses, lawmakers, and consumers who bear the brunt of higher costs. Internationally, Trump’s approach could be viewed as economic coercion, further eroding America’s soft power.

---

• ESUT holds maiden distinguished professors party, mulls innovation, commercialisation of research works
• It is Nigeria’s night of glory, Gov Mbah hails Lookman, Nnadozie, Super Falcons on CAF Awards
• Spine, brain diseases causing more deaths than cancers, HIV, Ebola, COVID_Prof. Ndubuisi
• Who Benefits from the Collapse of Bashar al-Assad’s Regime in Syria?
• Adada is the first state to be created from South East _Hon. Obetta

The BRICS Perspective

For the BRICS nations, Trump’s threats could be seen as validation of their efforts to create a more multipolar financial system. If anything, such rhetoric might accelerate their push toward financial independence from the dollar.

Countries like China and Russia have already made strides in reducing their reliance on the dollar through bilateral trade agreements denominated in local currencies. Meanwhile, nations such as Saudi Arabia and the UAE, with their vast oil reserves, could support a BRICS currency through commodity-backed trade mechanisms.

However, internal challenges within BRICS—such as varying economic policies, political priorities, and logistical hurdles—remain significant obstacles to creating a unified currency in the near term.

---

Conclusion

While Trump’s threat is provocative, its implementation would likely face significant hurdles, both domestically and globally. The BRICS nations, aware of the potential backlash, may use this as an opportunity to rally further support for their initiatives. Whether or not they proceed with a new currency, Trump’s rhetoric underscores a shifting global economic order where challenges to U.S. dominance are becoming increasingly credible.

In the end, the real question is not whether Trump’s threat holds water but whether it reflects a deeper recognition of the U.S.’s waning influence in a rapidly evolving multipolar world.